Train your engineers on Claude using your codebase, not a sample app

Team enablement here means your engineers can change a Claude system without waiting for us, and without guessing. A slide deck about prompting does not do that. Four weeks on your repository does.

We teach prompting, tool design, evaluation and agentic coding where the code already lives. Anthropic exam prep is available for people who want the credential. The credential is not the point. The handover is.

What changes if enablement works

• PRs include eval cases, not only prompt diffs
• Someone owns the golden set
• Claude Code runs inside conventions you wrote down. See Claude Code workflows.
• Security questions have named answers, not vibes

What we will not do

We will not train a team to babysit a hosted black box they do not own. IP is yours from the first commit. If a vendor workflow cannot live in your git history, it does not belong in the curriculum.

When to choose enablement over a build

Choose enablement when the system mostly works and the bottleneck is the team. Choose a production build when nothing is live. Choose an audit when you cannot tell which of those is true.

Minimum engagement for the track is four weeks, $12k to $24k. Details are on the services page.